IELTS BRO| EVEREST

Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?


People propose various ways of how governments can improve urban life. Some argue that allocating more funds to the creation of artworks, including paintings and statues, is an effective approach. I agree with this proposal, considering the aesthetic and social roles of art, despite concerns about the additional financial burden on governments that must prioritize essential sectors such as healthcare.

The presence of artworks throughout a city offers several benefits. Firstly, beautifully crafted statues and paintings enhance the visual appeal of modern concrete landscapes, which often render urban life monotonous and uninspiring. Numerous European cities, such as Rome and Paris, exemplify how modern architecture can be harmoniously blended with art through globally renowned paintings and sculptures. As a result, this integration contributes to higher levels of satisfaction among urban residents regarding their local surroundings. Additionally, artistic public centers serve a crucial social purpose. Central statues and art galleries, for instance, often become significant landmarks where people gather for special occasions, such as art festivals or casual meetings with friends, fostering a sense of community. In my hometown, for example, young people often choose to meet near such landmarks because they are easily recognizable and accessible to all.

Some may argue that governments should allocate substantial financial resources to more pressing sectors rather than urban art. Healthcare, for instance, remains underdeveloped even in many metropolises, which poses a significant threat to public wellbeing, particularly during emergencies. A case in point is how the sudden outbreak of the Coronavirus in 2019-2020 resulted in millions of fatalities globally due to incompetence in medicine, which could have been prevented with better investments in the medical sector. However, I would still argue that funding art installations and paintings also contributes to the overall wellbeing of the public. Art galleries and cultural spaces serve as hotspots wherein individuals relax and find inspiration, thereby improving their mental health. A recent study published in The New York Times found that urban dwellers who regularly visited art galleries and public parks experienced significantly lower stress levels, despite living in densely populated areas. This evidence highlights the crucial role of urban artworks in enhancing the quality of life.

In conclusion, while it is essential for governments to allocate resources to critical sectors like healthcare, I firmly believe that incorporating more works of art into cities is a worthwhile initiative that governments should actively support since they add more charm to the cityscapes, strengthen the sense of unity in society and contribute to public well-being, making it a valuable investment.

By @IELTS_bro

The pie charts show the distribution of workers across three sectors – manufacturing, sales, and services – in two towns, labelled as Town A and Town B, over a period from 1960 to 2010.
Overall, Town A witnessed a decline in employment within the manufacturing and sales sectors, while the services sector saw a steady increase, ultimately becoming the dominant sector by the end of the period. In contrast, Town B experienced a gradual reduction in the share of workers in manufacturing, though it remained the leading sector throughout the period, while the sales and services sectors expanded over the given time-frame.

In Town A, the largest proportion of workers was employed in the manufacturing sector in 1960, at 41%. However, by 2010, this figure had sharply declined to just 20%. Similarly, employment in the sales sector almost halved, decreasing from 30% to 16%. In contrast, the share of workers in the services sector surged dramatically from 29% to 64%, overtaking manufacturing as the dominant sector.

In comparison, Town B experienced somewhat different changes. Manufacturing remained the leading sector throughout the period, although its share fell significantly from 70% to 53%. Meanwhile, the percentage of workers in the services sector rose substantially, from 10% to 25%. Employment in the sales sector showed minimal change, with a modest increase of just 2%, from 20% to 22%, over the entire period.

Again me @IELTS_bro

The bar chart shows the proportions of Australian men and women who regularly participated in physical activities across six distinct age groups in 2010. Overall, women were more physically active than men in most age categories, except for the youngest group (15-24), where males had a slightly higher participation rate. Notably, the highest levels of physical activity among women were observed in the 35-64 age range, while the youngest group recorded the highest activity levels for men in the given year.

Among women, the highest participation rates were observed in the 35-64 age range, with the 45-54 age group leading at 53.3%, followed closely by the 55-64 group at 53% and the 35-44 group at 52.5%. In contrast, male participation in these categories was considerably lower, with respective figures of 43.1%, 45.1%, and 39.5%. Similarly, women outnumbered men by nearly 7% in the 25-34 age group, where 48.9% of women participated in physical activities. However, the gap was minimal in the oldest age category (65+), where 47.1% of women participated, surpassing men by just 1%.

Conversely, more men in the 15-24 age group engaged in physical activities than their female counterparts. At almost 53%, male participation in this category was the highest among all age groups for men, exceeding female participation rate by approximately 5%.

Also by @IELTS_bro

Some people believe that hard work and determination are key factors for success, while others argue that money and personal appearance are more important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There are differing views on the determinants of success, with some asserting that hard work and determination are the most crucial factors, while others contend that wealth and physical appearance hold greater importance. In my view, perseverance and dedication are fundamental to achieving success, although the impact of financial resources and appearance cannot be entirely overlooked.

From one perspective, financial affluence undoubtedly provides individuals with significant advantages. When wealthy individuals set goals, they can easily access the necessary resources to support their preparation, streamlining the path to success. In the business world, for instance, start-ups with substantial financial backing can invest in high-quality training programs and mentorships from professional entrepreneurs. These opportunities offer invaluable insights into essential skills, such as corporate management and strategic investment, ultimately fostering the development of thriving companies. Similarly, personal appearance can also play a crucial role in achieving success. In modern society, professional attire—such as well-ironed shirts, tailored suits, and polished shoes—creates a positive first impression, reflecting qualities like punctuality and responsibility. This can help individuals earn respect and trust, thereby facilitating success in both personal and professional relationships.

Despite these advantages, I firmly believe that hard work and determination are far more critical in achieving success. When individuals consistently work on improving their soft and technical skills, they gain valuable experience, which enables them to make well-informed decisions and achieve better outcomes. Cristiano Ronaldo, for example, rose from a humble background to global stardom through consistent practice and dedication. Additionally, determination fosters resilience, which is vital for overcoming obstacles and setbacks. Without this quality, many successful figures would have given up in the face of failure. The stories of Colonel Sanders, the founder of KFC, and J.K. Rowling, the author of Harry Potter, can exemplify this principle. Their perseverance, rather than financial privilege or appearance, allowed them to leave an indelible mark on history despite numerous rejections.

In conclusion, while wealth and appearance undeniably contribute to success by providing resources and creating positive impressions, I believe that they are not as influential as hard work and determination. These qualities not only lead to the accumulation of valuable experience but also instill resilience, which drives individuals to achieve their goals despite challenges.

By @IELTS_bro

#classwork

Some people believe that parents have to supervise their children strictly. Others, however, think that children should be given some independence on their actions and decisions.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There are differing views on the best way of bringing up children, with some advocating for the strict control over children’s actions and decisions, and others favoring more independence given to the young. While I acknowledge the importance of supervising children to complement their lack of life experience and for improved parent-child relationships, I would still argue that more freedom given to children could be a wise choice.

Proponents of strict parental supervision cite several reasons for their stance. First, when children’s actions and behavior are under parents’ control, they tend less to harm themselves due to unawareness of real-life dangers. A child who watches cartoons on a frequent basis, for instance, may consider approaching all animals to pat them as a safe action, since most cartoons depict even the most dangerous animals as human-friendly. Stray dogs and cats, for example, often bite or scratch children when children want to play with them, resulting in serious wounds and even rabies, which highlights the importance of parental guidance. It is also worth noting that parents who consistently control their children benefit from stronger parent-child bonds. This is because when parents spend more time supervising their children’s actions, their children feel more care and attention, leading to more close-knit families in society.

Nonetheless, critics of this view, myself included, are convinced that it is important parents allow their children to take actions more independently. First of all, constantly monitoring children’s actions and behavior is counterproductive for children’s emotional and mental development. This is because parents who dictate every step of their children too often make them reliant on external support. Conversely, if children learn to make decisions on their own, they hone numerous skills, such as independent decision-making and learning from their own mistakes, which will benefit young individuals in adulthood. Although this independence renders children more prone to facing challenges in their young ages, the experience they gain cumulates, making them more resilient and well-rounded individuals in the future.

In conclusion, although controlling children’s actions and behavior can be validated for safety reasons and tighter relationships between parents and children, I am adamant that more freedom given to children makes them better prepared for the problems of adult life, honing their decision-making skills and resilience. Therefore, I believe that parents should let their children have more independence.

By @IELTS_bro

You wanna know the real secret of learning English fast and effectively? The gif below explains it in a straightforward way👇

I wonder, like Does anyone ever believe them? Bs😂

#Сенсация

⚡Ушбу ўқитувчи опамиз 7 кунда инглиз тилини мукаммал ўргатадиган УСЛУБНИ ўйлаб топибди😳

Унга кўра атиги 90 минутда инглиз тили грамматикасини тўлиқ ўрганиб оларкансиз, 7 кунда эса тўлиқ тилни

Йиллаб инглиз тилини ўрганиб юрган танишларга юбориб қўямиз

Бизда кузатиб боринг👇🏻                

TELEGRAM | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE

Speaking 9.0👀

#personalscoreupdate

Omg Barcelona is unstoppable now

A solid 8.0 performance. Next time, we will send a band 9.0 performance. Stay tuned

We continue conducting speaking mock tests, and yesterday I had a really interesting session with Humoyunmirzo, who is one of the teachers at Everest. His score varies between 8.0 and 8.5, so I provided specific comments, explaining what needs to be done to achieve a consistent 8.5 and potentially reach a 9.0.

Anyone stuck at 8.0-8,5 level can benefit a lot from the feedback part of this video session.

#SPEAKINGMOCK🔈

@dilshodbekravshanov ✈️

Describe the countryside you went to

@IELTS_bro

Describe a product from your area (such as a food or handicraft)

@IELTS_bro

Describe a special day out that didn’t cost a lot

@IELTS_bro

Describe something you do to keep yourself concentrated

@IELTS_bro